CV, Work & Portfolio Review
We look at what the candidate says they have done, then ask what they personally owned, built, changed, measured or solved.
The interview process
The interview is designed to find the edge of a candidate's real capability: what they can build, how deeply they understand their craft, how they respond when they do not immediately know the answer and how much direction they need to keep moving.
Capability over performance
A confident interview is useful, but digital marketing is not a job where the correct terminology is enough. We want to understand the candidate's operating range: what they have genuinely done, what they can do without assistance, where their knowledge starts to thin out and what they do when they reach that boundary.
The important question is not only “Do you know this?” It is “What do you do when you don't?”
That distinction matters because SEO, PPC, analytics, automation, social platforms, AI tools, tracking systems and website technology change constantly. A strong digital marketer cannot wait for somebody to hand them a complete instruction manual every time the environment changes.
What we are looking for
How the interview may work
Not every role needs every stage. We adapt the process to seniority and specialism, but the objective is consistent: get past rehearsed answers and build a realistic picture of how the person would perform in the job.
We look at what the candidate says they have done, then ask what they personally owned, built, changed, measured or solved.
We move from broad questions into detail. If an answer is strong, we go deeper until we understand whether the knowledge is practical, memorised or genuinely experienced.
Where useful, we may give a time-bounded test, controlled website, campaign scenario, audit or brief to see what the candidate can actually produce.
We may deliberately take the discussion beyond familiar territory. We want to see when the candidate reaches the edge of their knowledge and how they handle it.
An unfamiliar problem can be useful. We look at the questions they ask, the assumptions they challenge, what they would research and how they form a workable plan.
We consider whether the person can take ownership, communicate progress and work with limited supervision while still knowing when a decision needs to be escalated.
Role-specific practical checks
A generic marketing quiz tells us very little. Practical checks should resemble the thinking the candidate will actually need in the role.
Review a site, diagnose a traffic loss, prioritise technical issues, critique internal linking or explain how they would investigate an indexing problem.
Assess campaign structure, explain wasted spend, diagnose falling conversions, discuss tracking or build a sensible testing plan from limited information.
Turn a business objective into a campaign idea, critique a content brief, explain audience intent or build a short plan that has more substance than posting for activity's sake.
Interpret a messy data picture, identify what is missing, challenge a misleading metric and explain what evidence would be needed before making a recommendation.
Map a workflow, identify failure points, choose sensible tools and show that they can investigate unfamiliar integrations rather than needing every connection prescribed.
Build or repair something, trace a front-end problem, reason through performance or explain how they would approach an unfamiliar stack without pretending to know what they do not.
Self-starters
We are looking for people who can make progress without constant hand-holding. That does not mean guessing recklessly or disappearing into a task for three days.
A self-starter is not somebody who never asks for help. It is somebody who knows how to keep moving and knows when help actually matters.
Signals we pay attention to
The best signal is often not a perfect answer. It is whether the candidate can explain what they know, admit what they do not, and show a disciplined way of getting from uncertainty to a useful answer.
Employer questions
No. We use practical assessments when they help clarify capability for the role. The process should fit the specialism, seniority and evidence already available.
No. A useful assessment can be realistic without turning the interview into unpaid production work. Tests should be controlled and time-bounded.
Someone who can clarify the goal, form a sensible plan, research unfamiliar problems and make progress without every step being prescribed — while still knowing when to escalate.
Because the industry changes. Employers need to know how somebody behaves when the familiar answer runs out and the job requires investigation, judgement, building and adaptation.
Employer-first screening
Tell us the role, the outcomes you need and the level of independence the person will require. We can shape the screening and interview process around the real work rather than a generic checklist.